Researchers in the University’s College of Mindset studied whether a stronger dilation for the most well-liked sex is produced when individuals viewed pictures depicting higher degrees of sexual explicitness in comparison to pictures low on sexual explicitness. Using eye-tracking technology in conjunction with managed stimuli, the team discovered that pupillary responses to pictures of women and men were sex-specific however, not sensitive towards the sexual explicitness from the picture. Researcher Dr Janice Attard-Johnson said: We discovered that adjustments in pupil size when looking at images of women and men corresponded with individuals’ self-reported sexual orientation.Just how do we decide where you can direct our interest, without great deal of thought? The dominant theory in attention studies is visual salience, Henderson said. Salience means stuff that stand out from the backdrop, like colourful berries on the history of leaves or a brightly lit object in an area. Saliency is not too difficult to measure. You are able to map the quantity of saliency in various areas of an image by measuring comparative contrast or lighting, for example. Henderson called this the magpie theory our interest is attracted to bright and shiny items. It becomes apparent, though, it can’t be correct, he stated, in any other case we’d end up being distracted constantly. Producing a Map of Meaning Henderson and postdoctoral researcher Taylor Hayes attempt to check whether interest is guided instead by how meaningful we get an area in your view.